Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46838 (KAR)

EXQUISITE MOTO LLP v. RAMESH SUNDARA MURTHY

MFA/2796/2019 · 2026-01-14

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2287 MFA No. 2796 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 2796 OF 2019 (AA) BETWEEN: 1. EXQUISITE MOTO LLP A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.126, PRESTIGE NUGGET, INFANTRY ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER MRS.SATYA SHANKAR 2. MRS. SATYA SHANKAR W/O MRS. ANIL KUMAR SHANKAR, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, HAVING HER OFFICE AT NO.126, PRESTIGE NUGGET, INFANTRY ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SUHAS, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MUNIYAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: RAMESH SUNDARA MURTHY S/O SUNDARA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT MANTRI ALTIUS APARTMENT, SITE NO.17, 14TH FLOOR, RAJBHAVAN ROAD, Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2287 MFA No. 2796 of 2019 OFF INFANTRY ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. AMANDA CHAKRAVARTHY, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. AJESH KUMAR S., ADVOCATE) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 37 OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED AS UNDER: ORAL JUDGMENT Counsel for the respective parties appeared in person. The captioned appeal is filed challenging the order passed by the Trial Court on an interim application. The Registry concerned has furnished the e-court case status as the suit has been disposed of. As already noted above, the petition is filed questioning the order on an interim application. As is well known that the interim order merges with the final order. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2287 MFA No. 2796 of 2019 In view of the disposal of the main case, nothing survives for consideration. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32