Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46821 (MAD)

K. Chandrasekar v. The State Rep By Its

CRL MP/6884/2026 · 2026-07-08

Shamim Ahmed

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.M.P.No.6884 of 2026 in Crl.RC.SR.No.100067 of 2025 SHAMIM AHMED, J. Heard Mr.P. Marimuthu, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr.M.M.I.Khaleel, learned Govt. Advocate (crl.side) for the 1st respondent and Mr.Thayalan, party-in-person/2nd respondent appeared through video conferencing. 2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking to condone the delay of 1057 days in filing the criminal revision petition. 3. The learned Govt. Advocate (crl.side) appearing for the 1st respondent and the 2nd respondent/part-in-person submitted that they have no objection in allowing this petition, as the matter has been amicable settled between the petitioner/accused and the 2nd respondent/complainant 4. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit filed in support of this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition, the delay of 1057 days in filing the above criminal revision petition is condoned. 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SHAMIM AHMED, J . msr 5. Office is directed to allot the regular number to Criminal Revision within 24 hours. 08.07.2026 msr Crl.M.P.No.6884 of 2026 in Crl.RC.SR.No.100067 of 2025 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis