Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4682 (UTT)

MUJEEB AHMAD v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/1467/2024 · 2026-01-05

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:158 SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS W PSS/ 1 4 6 7 / 2 0 2 4 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. D.K. Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner through video conferencing. Mr. Narayan Dutt, Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that since petitioner has joined at the transferred place, therefore the reliefs as claimed do not survive. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 05.01.2026 Mahinder/