IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91861 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-510 Year-2023 Thana- ATRI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1. Shankar Yadav S/o Ramswarath Yadav R/o vill- Tetua, Vidhar Par, P.S- Atri, Distt.- Gaya jee 2. Sanjay Yadav @ Sanjay Kumar S/o Ramswarath Yadav R/o vill- Tetua, Vidhar Par, P.S- Atri, Distt.- Gaya jee ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shankar Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Ms.Renuka Ratnakar (App.125) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 2 15-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 510 of 2023, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 448, 504, 506, 354/34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, as per the informant is that all the accused persons named in the F.I.R., including the petitioners entered into the house of the informant and assaulted the informant and his family members. It is further alleged that co-accused, Sanjay kumar (the petitioner no. 02), Upendra yadav, Azad Kumar and Ranjya Yadav, looted the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91861 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 2/3 articles like khatiyan, Kewala, ornaments and clothes from the house of the informant having broken a box. It is further alleged that co-accused Azad Kumar assualted a child, namely, Shiv Kumar, aged about 5 years and co-accused, Sanjay Kumar (Petitioner no. 02) assaulted a child aged about 8 months. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. The petitioners and informant are agnates and there is land dispute between them due to which scuffle took place. The petitioners have five criminal antecedents. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer of anticipatory bail. 6. All the petitioners are having five criminal antecedents which have been disclosed in paragraph 3 of the application. In all five cases, the petitioners are said to be on bail. In paragraph 11 of the application, it has been stated that the informant and his family members are in habit of lodging FIR against the petitioners, thereby trying to establish that there is a history of litigation between the two sides. Learned counsel for the petitioners also draws attention of this Court to a compromise between both sides which has been brought on record by way of Annexure-2 of the application. There is also Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91861 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 3/3 general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. Under these circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 7. Let the petitioners, named above, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya Jee in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 510 of 2023, subject to the conditions laid down under section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. kiran/- (Alok Kumar Sinha, J) U T