Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement :02.07.2026 Date of uploading :09.07.2026 APHC010536602024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4530/2024 Between: 1. M PADMA, W/O P MARKANDEYULU AGED 42 YEARS OCC. CRT SA (ENG) O/O GTWAH SCHOOL (GIRLS), BOMMIKA (V)PO) BADDUMARRI PATHAPATNAM (MANDAL) SRIKAKULAM (DIST) R/O 1-425 KOPPALA APPANNA NAGAR, OPP GOVT DEGREE COLLEGE TEKKALI SRIKAKULAM 2. KOTTURU CHAKRAVARTHY, S/O LACHAYYA AGE 37 YRS OCC. CRT S A (HINDI) O/O GPS CHAKALIGOODA(VILL) ROLLAGUDDI(POST) SEETAMPETA(MANDAL) SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT R/O MAMIDIJOLA (VILLAGE) BHAGIRADHIPURAM (POST) HIRAMANDALAM (M) SRIKAKULAM 3. NIMMALA RAJABABU, S/O N SUKKU AGE 45 YRS OCC. CRT SA HINDI O/O GPS PAKKUDIBADRA (V) BHAMINI (M) BATHILI (P) PVP MANYAM R/O MANUMAKONDA (V) BHAMINI (M) BATHILI (P) PVP MANYAM 4. .PEDADA SARASWATHI, W/O GOPALARAO AGE 52 YRS OCC. CRT SA HINDI O/O GTWAH SCHOOL BANDAPALLI (GIRLS) BANDAPALLI(VILLAGE) MELIYAPUTTI (MANDAL) SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT R/O IJJAVARAM (VILLAGE) SANTABOMMALI (MANDAL) SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 5. DORA SARASWATHI, W/O TATAYYA AGE 38 YRS OCC. CRT SA TELUGU O/O GTWAH SCHOOL (GIRLS) SAVARABONTHU CHINAKITTALAPADU (POST) SARAVAKOTA (SO) SRIKAKULAM R/O DR NO. 3-77 MUGUPURAM (VILLAGE) PEDDA LAMBA (POST) SARAVAKOTA (SO) SRIKAKULAM (DIST) 6. PATNALA VIJAYA KUMARI, W/O JAGAN AGE 42 YRS OCC. CRT SA HINDI O/O GTWAH SCHOOL (GIRLS) POOTIKAVALADA(VILLAGE) KOTTURU (MANDAL) SRIKAKULAMA DISTRICT R/O DOOR NO 1-370 TOTHAVADA (VILLAGE) BURJA (MANDAL) SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 7. BIDDIKA RAMACHANDRUDU, S/O B SANGAYYA AGE 47 YRS OCC. CRT SA HINDI O/O G.P.S. (G.T.W. ABALASINGI) KOTTURU. MANDAL SRIKAKULAM R/O KOSANGI VILLAGE GUMADA POST SEETHAMPETA MANDAL PARVATHIPURAM MANYAM 8. MEENAKA UMAMAHESWARI, D/O RAMAMURTHY AGE 33 YRS OCC. SGT O/O GTWAGH SCHOOL GIRLS MUTYALU R/O PATHAPANUKUVALASA (VILLAGE)PEDDURU (POST) SEETHAMPETA (MANDAL) PARVATHIPURAM MANYAM (DIST) 9. JANNI RAJABABU, S/O KARUVULU AGE 46 YEARS OCC. CRT LP(HINDI) O/O GPS(TW)CHINNABAGGA CHINNABAGGA VILLAGE AND POST SEETHAMPETA MANYAM (PARVATHEEPURAM) R/O YARRATIGUDA VILLAGE KOTTURU (M) SRIKAKULAM 10. VOOYAKA RAJARAM, , S/O CHOWDARI AGE 42 YEARS OCC. CRT (LP, HINDI) O/O GPS (TW) ON NELLIGANDI, POOTHIKAVALASA, (POST) SEETHAMPETA(M) MANYAM R/O BONDI (VILLAGE), SEETHAMPETA (MADALAM) MANYAM (PARVATHIPURAM) ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. K KANNA BABU IASDELETED, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TRIBAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT BLOCK-ILL 1ST FLOOR AP SECRETARIAT AMARAVATHI VELAGAPUDI GUNTUR 2. SMT S BHARGAVI I A S, THE DIRECTOR TRIBAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT A P VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DISTRICT 3. SRI SWAPNIL DINKAR PUNDKAR I A SDELETED, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR TW SRIKAKULAM 4. SRI C YASWANTH KUMAR REDDY I A SDELETED, THE PROJECT OFFICER I T D A SEETHAMPET SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT RR 1,3 AND 4 ARE DELETED FROM THE ARRAY OF RESPONDENTS AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 29/01/26, VIDE IA NO-1/25 IN CC NO- 4530 OF 2024. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents herein under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act for willfully violation of the orders of this Honble Court in WP.No.19262 of 2024 dated 10.09.2024 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to delete the respondent no 1, 3 and 4 as party array in cause title and may pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. PAMARTHY RATHNAKAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. RAMALINGESWARA RAO KOCHARLA KOTA 2. The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: Heard Sri Ramalingeswara Rao Kocharla Kota, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The above contempt case is filed complaining about the violation of the order dated 10.09.2024 in W.P.No.19262 of 2024. 3. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Ramalingeswara Rao Kocharla Kota, learned counsel for the respondents, would submit that, pursuant to the order dated 10.09.2024 in W.P.No.19262 of 2024, the 2nd respondent has passed a speaking order vide Rc.No.78/2024/L(TW) dated 10.01.2025, after the contempt case was filed. Page 4 of 5 4. Since a speaking order was passed, this Court does not find any violation of the order 10.09.2024 in W.P.No.19262 of 2024. 5. Accordingly, the contempt case is dismissed. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 02.07.2026 SNI Whether the order is: Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 79 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4530/2024 Date: 02.07.2026 SNI