POOJA SHARMA W/O SHRI MAHENDRA SHARMA, D/O SH. DAYANAND SHARMA, v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/365/2026 · 2026-03-10
Anil Kumar Upman
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 468 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 468 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:10333] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 365/2026
1. Pooja Sharma W/o Shri Mahendra Sharma, D/o Sh. Dayanand Sharma, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Purana Mohalla, Thanagazi, Distt.- Alwar, Rajasthan-301022, Presently Resident Of 95, Opposite Bsf Office, Vpo-Chonp, Tehsil - Amer, Chonp, Jaipur, Rajasthan-303805.
2. Mahendra Sharma S/o Sh. Satya Narayan Sharma, Aged About 33 Years, R/o 95, Opposite Bsf Office, Vpo-Chonp, Tehsil - Amer, Chonp, Jaipur, Rajasthan-303805. ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan
2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan Police, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3. The Deputy Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur (West), Jaipur, Rajasthan.
4. Station House Officer, Police Station - Daulatpura, District Jaipur, Rajasthan
5. The Superintendent Of Police, District Alwar (Rajasthan).
6. Station House Officer, Police Station- Thanagazi, District Alwar(Rajasthan)
7. Dayanand Sharma (Father), R/o Purana Mohalla, Thanagazi, Distt.- Alwar, Rajasthan-301022
8. Surgyani Devi (Mother), R/o Purana Mohalla, Thanagazi, Distt.- Alwar, Rajasthan-301022.
9. Subhash Sharma (Brother), R/o Purana Mohalla, Thanagazi, Distt.- Alwar, Rajasthan-301022.
10. Kapil Sharma (Brother), R/o Purana Mohalla, Thanagazi, Distt.- Alwar, Rajasthan-301022.
11. Anjana Sharma (Sister), R/o Purana Mohalla, Thanagazi, Distt.- Alwar, Rajasthan-301022. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhawani Saini
[2026:RJ-JP:10333] (2 of 3) [CRLW-365/2026] Mr. Amit Meena Mr. Rajayan Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 10/03/2026
1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled.
2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel.
3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.7 to 11 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. It is submitted that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Arya Samaj Sanstha, Naya Khera, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur on 12.01.2026 and same has been registered on 12.01.2026. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.7 to 11 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection.
5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are
directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before
[2026:RJ-JP:10333] (3 of 3) [CRLW-365/2026] respondent No.4-Station House Officer, Police Station Daulatpura, District Jaipur, Rajasthan and respondent no.4 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners.
6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand
disposed of.
8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /211