- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4319 RSA No. 714 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 714 OF 2018 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: 1. UNUS BEIG SINCE DECEASED BY LR's 1(A). RESHMA W/O LATE UNUS BEIG AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS 1(B) Y.M. MOHAMMED AKBAR S/O LATE UNUS BEING AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS 1(C) SALMAN D/O LATE UNUS BEING AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS 1(D) SUFFIYAN D/O LATE UNUS BEIG AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT ARAKESHWARANAGARA MANDYA CITY-571 401 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR H.B, ADVOCATE FOR LR's DECEASED - [ABSENT]) Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4319 RSA No. 714 of 2018 AND: 1. SMT. SHARADAMMA W/O K.M. MUTHURAM AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS 2. K.M. MUTHURAMU S/O MUTHEGOWDA @ HOTTE KANEGOWDA RESPONDENT NOS.1 AND 2 ARE R/AT "BALAJI NILAYA" SADHATHNAGAR, 4TH CROSS GUTHALU ROAD MANDYA CITY-571 401 3. ATHEEQ AHMED S/O ABDUL WAZID AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 4. THOSIF PASHA S/O ABDUL WAZID AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS 5. THOUHEED PASHA S/O ABDUL WAZID AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS RESPONDENT NOS.3 TO 5 ARE RESIDING AT NO.4762/B NOOR MANSION, 4TH CROSS GUTHAL ROAD, SADATH NAGAR MANDYA CITY PIN:571 401 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED TAHIR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2; SRI. K.M. SANATH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR PROPOSED IMPLEADING RESPONDENTS ON IA 1/22) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4319 RSA No. 714 of 2018 THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDUR, 1908. THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS LISTED FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, either personally or through video conferencing. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 28.10.2025, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants. A perusal of the appeal papers would reflect that the appeal is filed in 2018. Now we are in 2026. The appeal is pending for almost eight years. As already noted above, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, either personally or through video conferencing. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4319 RSA No. 714 of 2018 Because of dismissal of the appeal, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE CH List No.: 2 Sl No.: 13