- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3180 RSA No. 279 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 279 OF 2025 (PAR/DEC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. NANJAMMA W/O LATE SHIVANNA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT KAMALAPURA VILLAGE TONDEBAVI HOBLI GOWRIBIDANUR TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-562101 2. SMT. BABY ALIAS BAVYA D/O LATE SHIVANNA W/O JAGADHEESH AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/AT BACHAHALLI VILLAGE NANDI HOBLI CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK AND DISTRICT-562107 3. SMT. RAJESHWARI D/O LATE SHIVANNA W/O NAVEEN KUMAR AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-562101 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. NATARAJU T., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SRI P RAMAIAH @ RAMANNA S/O LATE DODDANNA AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3180 RSA No. 279 of 2025 2. SMT. GOWRAMMA W/O P. RAMAIAH ALIAS RAMANNA AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS RESPONDENTS NO.1 AND 2 ARE R/AT KAMALAPURA VILLAGE TONDEBAVI HOBLI GOWRIBIDANURU TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT 3. SMT. SOWMYA. P W/O J.N. NAGESH AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/AT NEAR KANIAHAMMA SCHOOL ROAD, JAKKURU, BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU-560064 4. SMT. ASHWINI.P W/O N.LOKESH AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/AT NO-57, CHIKKA TUMAKURU VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI DODDABALLAPURA TALUK 5. SMT.NANNDINI.P W/O. NARASIMHAMURTHY.N AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/AT NO-D-9, 139, SFS 407 3RD MAIN ROAD YELAHANKA NEW TOWN BENGALURU-560 064. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.V MUNIRAJ GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R5) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.11.2024 PASSED IN RA.NO.95/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHIKKABALLAPURA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.09.2023 - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3180 RSA No. 279 of 2025 PASSED IN OS.NO. 42/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, GOWRIBIDANUR AND ETC., THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for fourth time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellants were directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellants are not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 26