( 2026:HHC:13767 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Ex. Petition No.666 of 2026 Decided on: 27th April, 2026 Nisha Kumari .......Petitioner versus State of H.P and others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr.Pranav Kaushal, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr.Rupinder Singh Thakur, Additional Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Rupinder Singh Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Learned Additional Advocate General has produced a copy of order dated 13.03.2026 passed by the Deputy Director of School Education (Elementary), Shimla, District Shimla-171004, H.P. The same is taken on record. 3. A perusal of office order reveals that the petitioner has been granted higher pay-scale after completion of two years regular service, subject to the final outcome of the LPA 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. ( 2026:HHC:13767 ) 2 filed by the State in Mohit Sharma’s case. The concerned DDO has been directed to fix the pay of the petitioner and release the arrears, as per Finance Department instruction. 4. Since the mandate contained in the judgment stands complied with, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present petition, except that the respondents shall pay consequential benefits to the petitioner within eight weeks from today. In case the benefits, in terms of order dated 13.03.2026 are not released in favour of the petitioner, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the execution petition. 5. The petition is accordingly disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any. ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) April 27, 2026 Judge (naveen)