IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1761 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-148 Year-2025 Thana- DARPA District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1. Arun Kumar S/o Jagat Narain Prasad R/o vill - Pipra, Ps- Darpa, District- East Champaran 2. Kalawati Devi W/o Arun Kumar R/o vill - Pipra, Ps- Darpa, District- East Champaran 3. Rajesh Sah S/o Ram Jagesar Sah @ Ramjagashar Sah R/o vill - Pipra, Ps- Darpa, District- East Champaran 4. Sachin Kumar S/o Jagatnarayan Prasad R/o vill - Pipra, Ps- Darpa, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Mritunjay Kumar Nirala ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 29-01-2026 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during pendency of this bail petition, petitioner no. 4 (Sachin Kumar) has been arrested and as such, he seeks permission to withdraw this bail petition, so far as petitioner no. 4 is concerned. 2. The anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, so far as petitioner no. 4 is concerned. 3. Rest petitioners (i.e. petitioner nos. 1, 2 & 3) apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 109, 352, 351(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. 4. It is submitted on behalf of petitioners that due to Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1761 of 2026(2) dt.29-01-2026 2/2 long standing land dispute between the parties, a simple Maarpeet took place in which both sides sustained injury. Case and counter case. Injuries, sustained by the injured, are simple in nature. Rest of the allegation is superficial in order to make the case grave. F.I.R. has been lodged after a delay of 4 days without any plausible explanation of delay. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 6. However, considering the fact that there is land dispute between the parties and injuries are simple in nature, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the petitioner nos. 1, 2 & 3, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Raxaul at Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Darpa P.S. Case No. 148 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the B.N.S.S., 2023. 7. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. anay (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T