Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46750 (KAR)

P.M.NATARAJA v. ANITHA LAKSHMI B R

WP/5510/2021 · 2026-01-23

Chillakur Sumalatha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3869 WP No. 5510 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO. 5510 OF 2021 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: P.M.NATARAJA S/O LATE MAHIMAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/AT NO.217, NEAR HOLY CHILD SCHOOL, PANTHARAPALYA, MYSORE ROAD, BENGALURU-560039. …PETITIONER (BY SRI.SIDHARTH BABURAO, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. B RAVINDRANATH., ADVOCATE) AND: ANITHA LAKSHMI B R D/O RANGASWAMY AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT BAGURU VILLAGE N MAHIGHATTA POST NITTURU HOBLI Digitally signed by SOWMYA DODDAMARAIAH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3869 WP No. 5510 of 2021 GUBBI TALUK TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 572 223 ALSO R/AT NEAR RAILWAY STATION HEGGERE, S M C POST TUMAKURU DISTRICT. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SHARATHKUMAR SHETTY.,ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED 3RD ADDITIONAL FAMILY JUDGE AT BANGALORE IN M.C.NO.4176/2019 DTD.24.01.2020 VIDE ANENXURE-A ON APPLICATION FILED BY THE RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 151 OF CPC AND UNDER ORDER IX RULE 7 OF CPC BY ALLOWING THE SAID APPLICATION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3869 WP No. 5510 of 2021 CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA ORAL ORDER Sri. Sidharth Baburao representing Sri.B.Ravindranath learned counsel on record for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. No representation on respondent's side on call. Permission as prayed for is accorded. Writ petition is thereby dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26