Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46749 (CAL)

ABDUL BADI AND ANR. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/22278/2026 · 2026-09-29

Bivas Pattanayak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

29.09.2026 Sl. No.2 Ct. No.14 ss IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE W.P.A. No. 22278 of 2026 Abdul Badi & anr. Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Santanu Maji Ms. Debrani Mondal …for the Petitioners Mr. Ratul Biswas Mr. Koushik Chowdhury Ms. Soumoyadipa Kanu … for the WBBPE 1. This matter is appearing in the list under the heading ‘To Be Mentioned’. 2. Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioners is taken on record. 3. Mr. Santanu Maji, learned Advocate for the petitioners submits that the grievance of the writ petitioners has already been redressed upon issuance of order of mutual transfers and thus the matter has become infructuous. He files written instruction of the petitioners along with memorandum dated 7th September, 2026, which are taken on record. 4. In view of such submission, the writ petition being W.P.A. No. 22278 of 2026 stands dismissed as being infructuous. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. All connected applications, if any, stand disposed of. 7. Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties on compliance of all necessary legal formalities. (Bivas Pattanayak, J.)