2 1 . BA] SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1 No.392 of 2026 Akeel Kha Vs. State of Uttarakhand Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Lalit Sharma and Ms. Suraiya Naaz, learned counsel for the Applicant. 2. Mr. J.P. Kandpal, learned AGA for the State. 3. Mr. M.C. Upadhyaya, learned counsel for the complainant. 4. Present bail application is moved by the applicant, who is in judicial custody in connection with FIR No.263 of 2025 for the offence punishable under Section 103(1), 109(1), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 333, 351(2), 352, 61(2) & Section 3(5) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 3/25 of Arms Act, Police Station Kichha, District Udham Singh Nagar. 5. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicant has been falsely implicated; there was no eye witness present at the spot. He submits that no specific role of firing has been assigned to the present applicant. He submits that wife of co- accused has contested the election of BDC and due to rivalry applicant has been implicated. He further submits that applicant is languishing in jail since 24.08.2025; he has the responsibility of entire family and due to his incarceration his family is facing great hardship. 6. Learned State counsel has opposed the bail application. 7. Having considered the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 8. Accordingly, bail application is allowed. Let the applicant-Akeel Kha be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. 9. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 08.05.2026 Arti