Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46739 (CAL)

RAJU BARMAN @ RAJU DAS @ RAJIB KUMAR DAS v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/3197/2026 · 2026-10-06

Debangsu Basak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

06.10.2026 DL-43 Court No.37 [Bench ID-265691] (AD) (Rejected) In the High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side C.R.M. (A) 3197 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Tamluk Police Station Case No.262 of 2026 dated 23.04.2026 corresponding to GR Case No.1156 of 2026 under Sections 126(2)/117(2)/103(1)/351(2)/61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, presently pending before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tamluk, Purba Medinipur. And In the matter of: Raju Barman @ Raju Das @ Rajib Kumar Das ….petitioner Mr. Malay Bhattacharyya, Advocate …for the petitioner Mr. Kallol Mondal, Ld. PP Mr. Anamitra Banerjee, Advocate Ms. Shalu Gupta, Advocate … for the State 1. Memo of evidence filed in Court be taken on record. 2. Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case of murder. 3. Materials in the case diary suggest involvement of the petitioner in the incident of murder. 4. Notwithstanding the police filing charge sheet, I do not deem it appropriate to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner considering the nature of the incident and the involvement of the petitioner therein. 5. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. 6. C.R.M. (A) 3197 of 2026 is dismissed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) ABHIJIT DAS Digitally signed by ABHIJIT DAS Date: 2026.10.06 17:53:23 +05'30'