- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5499-DB RFA No. 340 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.340 OF 2023 (RES) BETWEEN: SMT. MEENA P W/O HARISH N AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/A NO.61, GAYANA GANGA 1ST FLOOR, 1ST MAIN ROAD DATTATREYA NAGAR HOSAKEREHALLI, BSK 3RD STAGE BENGALURU-560085. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. KARTHIK ANANDA, ADV. FOR SMT. VANDANA P.L., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. B.V. SUBBARAYAN S/O LATE B V VENKATARAYA JOIS AGED ABOUT 92 YEARS R/A NO.33, SEETHARAMA MANDIRAM ROAD BENGALURU-560040. 2. SNEHA DEVELOPERS A PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.372, IST FLOOR, M K PUTTALINGAIAH ROAD Digitally signed by BANGALORE ANJANAPPA KRISHNA KUMAR Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5499-DB RFA No. 340 of 2023 PADMANABHANAGARA BENGALURU-560070. REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI N S MUKUNDA 3. SRI N S MUKUNDA S/O LATE N S RAO AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS OFFICE AT NO.372, IST FLOOR M K PUTTALINGAIAH ROAD PADMANABHANAGARA BENGALURU-560070 ALSO AT NO.106, 3RD FLOOR SAMPOORNA APARTMENT MODEL HOUSE STREET BENGALURU-560004 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SATHYANARAYANA REDDY, ADV. FOR R2 & R3 (VK FILED, NOTICE NOT YET ORDERED; VK FILED BY SRI V.B.SHIVAKUMAR, ADV. FOR R1 IS RETURNED WITH OFFICE OBJECTIONS SINCE NOTICE NOT YET ORDERED) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 13.12.2022 PASSED ON IA NO.1 IN EX.NO. 2249/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE XLII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE I.A.NO.1 FILED U/O 21 RULE 58 R/W SEC.151 OF CPC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5499-DB RFA No. 340 of 2023 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) Learned counsel appearing for the appellant has filed a memo. The memo reads as under: "The Appellant in the above case respectfully submits that the parties have amicably settled the matter, hence the above appeal has become infructuous. It is therefore prayed that the above appeal may kindly be disposed of as having become infructuous, in the interest of equity and justice." 2. In view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE RAK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2