SUSHILA DEVI v. M/S CENTRAL COALFIELD LIMITED THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR
WPC/7237/2025 · 2026-01-06
Sri Ananda Sen
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4673 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4673 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:122 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
WP(S) No.7237 of 2025
----- Sushila Devi, aged about 46 years, Wife of Late Rajeshwar Rai, Resident of Dhaura No. 5, P.O.-Dhori, P.S.-Bermo, Dist.-Bokaro.
… Petitioner(s).
Versus
1. M/s Central Coalfield Limited through its Chairman cum Managing Director, Darbhanga House, Ranchi, office at Kutchery Road, P.O. & P.S. Morabadi, Dist. Ranchi.
2. The Director, (Personnel), Central Coalfield Limited, Darbhanga House, Ranchi, office at Kutchery Road, P.O. & P.S. Morabadi, Dist.- Ranchi.
3. The General Manager, (Personnel & Industrial Relations), M/s Central Coalfield Limited, Darbhanga House, Ranchi, office at Kutchery Road, P.O. & P.S. Morabadi, Dist.- Ranchi.
4. The General Manager, M/s Central Coalfield Limited, Dhori Area, P.O.-Dhori, P.S.-Bermo, Dist.-Bokaro.
5. The Project Officer, M/s Central Coalfields Limited, Amlo Project, P.O.-Phusro Bazar, P.S.-Bermo, Dist.-Bokaro.
… Respondent(s).
CORAM :
SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
------ For the Petitioner(s) : None For the CCL
: Mr. A. K. Das, Advocate
Mr. S. Goswami, Advocate …......
04 /06.01.2026: No one appears for the petitioner.
2. Heard learned counsel representing the respondents.
3. Reference has been made to the last order dated 11.12.2025 wherein the petitioner has confined his prayer to the prayer no. (ii). Prayer no. (ii) of this writ petition reads as follows:
“(ii) for direction upon the respondent concerned to pay the gratuity, LIC with interest of her husband which has not been paid to the petitioner till date.”
4. Today, learned counsel for the respondents had handed over the document in support of his statement that the gratuity amount along with the interest has been paid. It also suggests that the LIC amount has already been paid. This document is kept on record.
2026:JHHC:122 2
5. Considering the fact that the amounts have been paid, in my opinion the prayer of the petitioner in this writ petition which is confined to prayer no. (ii) had already been redressed.
6. If the petitioner has got any other grievance it will be open to the petitioner to approach appropriate authority of Central Coalfields Limited.
7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of.
(ANANDA SEN, J.) 06.01.2026 Tanuj/CP-2
Uploaded on 08.01.2026