- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4391 WP No. 29432 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO.29432 OF 2018 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. T. R. SHIVADAS S/O. LATE RAMAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT #205, NELLIHUDIKERE, SIDDAPURA - 571 253, N. KODAGU DISTRICT. 2. SRI. IMRAN KHAN S/O. MOHIDDIN NAWAS KHAN, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/AT NELLIHUDIKERE, SIDDAPURA - 571 253, N. KODAGU DISTRICT. 3. SRI. MOHAMMED ALI. A S/O. ABDUL SAMMAD, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/AT 514, NELLIHUDIKERE, SIDDAPURA - 571 253, N. KODAGU DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RANJITH K.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYATH RAJ, Digitally signed by PAVITHRA B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4391 WP No. 29432 of 2018 M.S. BUILDING, DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILLA PANCHAYATH, KODAGU DISTRICT, MADIKERI - 571 201. 3. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER TALUK PANCHAYATH, SOMWARPET TALUK, KODAGU DISTRICT - 571 253. 4. THE PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER NELLIHUDIKERE GRAMA PANCHAYATH, NELLIHUDIKERE, KODAGU DISTRICT - 571 253. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. CHANDINI SINGH, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. ISMAIL.M.MUSBA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE DISMISSAL ORDER DATED 29.06.2018 VIDE ANNEXURE-D ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 AND QUASH THE PUBLIC NOTICE DATED 23.06.2018 IN SO FAR AS FIXING THE TRADE LICENSE FEE FOR RUNNING CHICKEN MEAT SHOP I.E., SERIAL NO.2 IS CONCERNED VIDE ANNEXURE-C TO THE WRIT PETITION ISSUED BY R-4 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Despite the order dated 07.01.2026, there is no appearance on the part of the petitioners today also. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4391 WP No. 29432 of 2018 2. Perusal of the order sheet indicates that none has been appearing to the petitioners in the earlier occasions. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE PB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2