Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46724 (MAD)

M. Murugesan v. C.Raja

CRL MP/8032/2026 · 2026-07-03

Shamim Ahmed

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.M.P.No.8032 of 2026 in Crl.RC.SR.No.104141 of 2025 SHAMIM AHMED, J. Heard Mr. R. Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for the Petitioner. 2. This Court already issued notice to the respondent on 01.06.2026. As per the office report dated 03.06.2026, notice has already been served on the respondent. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, nobody appeared on behalf of the respondent to argue this case. Accordingly, service on the respondent is held sufficient. It appears that the respondent has nothing to say in this condone delay application. 3. Mr. R. Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking to condone the delay of 44 days in filing the criminal revision petition. 4. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit filed in support of this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition, the delay of 44 days in filing the above criminal revision petition is condoned. 5. The Office is directed to allot the regular number to Crl.R.C., and list the case for admission on 21.07.2026. 03.07.2026 msr 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SHAMIM AHMED, J . msr Crl.M.P.No.8032 of 2026 in Crl.RC.SR.No.104141 of 2025 03.07.2026 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis