Kundan Kumar Singh @ Kundan Singh v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./949/2026 · 2026-02-02
R P Mishra
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 46719 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 46719 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.949 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-275 Year-2025 Thana- MADHAURAH District- Saran ====================================================== Kundan Kumar Singh @ Kundan Singh S/o- Late Dhirendra Singh Resident of Bhawalpur P.S- Marhowarah, Dist- Saran,Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhiraj Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 3 02-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Marhowrah P.S. Case No. 275 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 305, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. Prosecution case, in short, is that on 29.04.2025 at about 8:00 P.M., the accused persons came on motorcycles, threatened the informant at gunpoint, trespassed into his house, ransacked it and looted a briefcase containing 1,00,000/- and ₹ gold ornaments. While fleeing, they assaulted the informant’s son with a knife causing serious injuries with intent to kill, beat the informant’s brother, snatched a gold chain, and escaped.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.949 of 2026(3) dt.02-02-2026 2/3
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that general and omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner. No specific overt act is alleged against the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that the specific allegation of assault is against co-accused Sumit Kumar Singh. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 12.09.2025 and has three criminal antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Marhowrah P.S. Case No. 275 of 2025, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner. (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.949 of 2026(3) dt.02-02-2026 3/3 fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (III) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
Alok Verma/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U T