06.10.2026 Item No.35 Court No.37 CHC Allowed In The High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side C.R.M.(A) 3189 of 2026 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with New Barrackpore Police Station Case No. 196 of 2026 dated 15.08.2026 under Sections 329(3)/ 115(2)/ 117(2)/ 74/351(2)/303(2)/324(4)/3(5) B.N.S, pending before the Learned Sub-Divisional Court, Barrackpore. And In the matter of : Arjun Mondal & Ors. ...… petitioners Mr. Nikhil Kumar Gupta, Advocate Mr. Subhadeep Maitra, Advocate Mr. Maheswar Malo Das, Advocate Ms. Amisha Sengupta, Advocate .…for the petitioners Mr. Arjun Ray, Advocate Mr. Supreem Naskar, Advocate .…for the State 1. Memo of Evidence filed in Court be kept with the record. 2. Petitioners seek anticipatory bail. 3. State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 4. Two persons suffered injuries in an incident of assault. 5. The injury report does not suggest that, any of the injuries so suffered by the victims can be classified as grievous hurt. 2 6. There are civil disputes between the parties. 7. Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioners therein, I grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 8. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, corresponding to Section 482(2) of the BNSS and that, petitioner no.2, namely, Minati Mondal and petitioner no.3, namely, Sandhya Mondal will cooperate with the investigation till the conclusion of investigation and petitioner no.1, namely, Arjun Mondal will meet the Investigating Officer once in a week till the conclusion of investigation and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. 9. This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. 3 10. CRM(A) 3189 of 2026 is disposed of. (Debangsu Basak, J.) CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY Digitally signed by CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY Date: 2026.10.07 10:40:49 +05'30'