Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46706 (MAD)

Abdul Salam v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Shenkottai

CRL MP(MD)/12652/2026 · 2026-07-08

A D Jagadish Chandira, R Poornima

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.07.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA AND THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA Crl.M.P(MD) No.12652 of 2026 and Crl.A(MD) No.299 of 2026 Abdul Salam ... Petitioner -Vs- The Inspector of Police, Shenkottai Police Station, Tirunelveli District Crime No.66 of 2020 ... Respondent PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS to modify the condition imposed in the order dated 02.06.2026 in Crl.M.P(MD) No.9973 of 2026 in Crl.M.P(MD) No.5111 of 2026 in Crl.A (MD) No.299 of 2026 dated 20.04.2026. For Petitioner : Mr.S.M.A.Jinnah For Respondents : Mr.C.Christopher Counsel for the State of Tamil Nadu(Crl.Side) ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ORDER (Order of the Court was made by A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA,J.) This Petition has been filed to modify the condition imposed in the order dated 02.06.2026 in Crl.M.P(MD) No.9973 of 2026 in Crl.M.P(MD) No.5111 of 2026 in Crl.A(MD) No.299 of 2026 dated 20.04.2026. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that this Court while suspending the sentence imposed on the petitioner vide its order dated 20.04.2026 has directed the petitioner to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties, of whom, one should be a blood relative, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate, Shencottah. Since the petitioner was unable to comply with the condition he has filed a petition to modify the said condition and thereby this Court by an order dated 02.06.2026 directed the petitioner to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties of whom one should be a relative (paternal uncle). He submitted that he does not have any relative from paternal side and he has relatives only from the maternal side, thereby he has filed this petition to modify the said condition. 3. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the State of Tamil Nadu (Crl.Side). 4. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner the ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis condition imposed on the petitioner directing him to execute a bond for a sum of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties of whom one should be a relative (paternal uncle) is modified to the effect that the petitioner shall execute a bond for the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties from the maternal side (Mohamed Ali Jamludeen and Peer Mohamed) for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate, Shencottah. All other conditions shall remain unaltered. [A.D.J.C., J.] & [R.P., J.] 08.07.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No aav Note:Issue order copy on 08.07.2026 To 1.The Inspector of Police, Shenkottai Police Station, Tirunelveli District 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J. AND R.POORNIMA , J. aav Crl.M.P(MD) No.12652 of 2026 and Crl.A(MD) No.299 of 2026 08.07.2026 ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis