Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46703 (KAR)

SMT. A.P. LAKSHMIDEVI v. SRI. A.P. VISHNUMURTHY

RSA/344/2023 · 2026-02-03

Ravi V Hosmani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6417 RSA No. 344 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 344 OF 2023 BETWEEN: SMT. A.P. LAKSHMIDEVI W/O LATE K. RAJESHWAR, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/AT HOSAKERE, SURYADEVASTHANA POST, KOPPA TALUK, CHIKKAMGALURU DISTRICT - 577 126. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. H. R. SANTHOSH, ADVOCATE (ABSENT) ) AND: 1. SRI. A.P. VISHNUMURTHY S/O SRI. PUTTENAYAK, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, 2. SRI. A.P. VIVEKANANDA S/O SRI. PUTTENAYAK, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, 3. SRI A.P. GANAPAIAH NAYAK S/O SRI PUTTENAYAK, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, SMT. RAJAMMA W/O SRI PUTTENAYAK, SINCE DEAD REPRESENTED BY HER LEGAL HEIRS I.E., RESPONDENT NO. 1 TO 3, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6417 RSA No. 344 of 2023 4. SRI E. V. BENNI S/O SRI VARGHESE, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/O EDASSERY HOUSE, NADAVAYAL POST, SULTHANBATTERY TALUK, WAYANAD DISTRICT, KERALA STATE. PRESENT ADDRESS: HIREKUDIGE VILLAGE, KOPPA TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT-577 126. 5. SMT. SHASHIKALA W/O SRI VISHNUMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, 6. SMT. A.V. SHASHVATHI D/O SRI VISHNUMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, 7. SRI A.V. SIDDANTH S/O VISHNUMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, RESPONDNT NOS.1 TO 3 AND 5 TO 7 ARE R/AT ALIGE, SURYADEVASTHANA, HIREKUDIGE VILLAGE, KOPPA TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT-577 126. 8. SRI J SRISHA R. SHETTY S/O RATNAKARA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/AT SHOBHA SHREE, MURUDESHWARA LAYOUT, BINTRAVALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, KOPPA TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 126 …RESPONDENTS - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6417 RSA No. 344 of 2023 THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.07.2022 PASSED IN RA NO.37/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE (DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISMISSING THE SUIT AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.10.2019 PASSED IN OS NO.13/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, N.R. PURA, ITINERATE AT KOPPA. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT Though matter was passed over and called again, there is no representation for appellant. Matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for 4th time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, even on cost, office objections remained un-complied and cost is also not paid. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. 2. Accordingly, Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE LDC:List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5 CT-SG