IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 297 of 2025 In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION/45/2025 ================================================ JAGDISHBHAI MULJIBHAI KORADIYA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. ================================================ Appearance: MR DARSHIT H RAVAL(11887) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 HCLS COMMITTEE(4998) for the Respondent(s) No. 2 MS NILAM N CHAUHAN(6635) for the Respondent(s) No. 2 NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 3 MR PRANAV DHAGAT, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ================================================ CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL Date : 20/02/2026 ORAL ORDER 1. By this application under section 5 of the Limitation Act, the applicant seeks condonation of delay of 111 days caused in filing the captioned revision application. 2. Rule, returnable forthwith. Learned advocates for the respective respondents waive service. 3. Heard, the learned advocates for the respective parties p. 2 present. 3.1 The learned advocate for the applicant, drawing attention of the Court to the grounds for delay narrated in the application memo, states that sufficient cause has been made out for condonation of delay and accordingly, it is urged that the delay that has caused in filing the revision application, may be condoned, to which, the learned advocate for the respondent No. 2 has vehemently opposed, stating that no sufficient cause has been shown to condone the delay and accordingly, it is requested to reject the application. 4. Having heard and considering the averments made in the memorandum of application, the Court is of the view that the delay that has occasioned in preferring the revision application has been sufficiently explained. The application, therefore, succeeds and is, accordingly, allowed. The delay caused in filing the revision application is hereby condoned. Rule is made absolute accordingly. [ P. M. Raval, J. ] hiren/DB/1/5tss20226