Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4670 (AP)

V. Anjaneyulu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/16292/2026 · 2026-07-01

Nyapathy Vijay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 02.07.2026 Date of uploading : 10.07.2026 APHC010305312026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] THURSDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 16292/2026 Between: 1. V. ANJANEYULU, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCC SELECTION GRADE SECRETARY (RTD) AGRICULTURE MARKET COMMITTEE, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT - ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 522238 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522238 3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, AGRICULTURE MARKET COMMITTEE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522238 4. COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR, AGRICULTURE MARKET COMMITTEE CHUTTUGUNTA CIRCLE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT 522004 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the in action of the respondents authorities not finalising and not sanction/releasing the pension and other benefits after retirement of the petitioner on 30-11-2025. even though he was not involved in any irregularities and no disciplinary proceedings pending and without any reasons withholding the petitioner pension as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional in violation of Art. 14, 19, 21, 31(1) and 300-A of the constitution of India and in violation of the Revised Pension Rules, 1980. Consequently direct the respondents to sanction pension and release the retirement benefits to the petitioner as per Apex Court judgments with interest 12percent and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to release /sanction pension and also release the retirement benefits to the petitioner as per Apex Court judgments with interest 12percent a pending disposa| of the Writ Petition and pass such o Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CHEJARLA VENKATESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I 2. GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 16292/2026 O R D E R: The present Writ Petition is filed to declare the action of the Respondent Authorities in not finalizing and not sanctioning / releasing the pension and other retirement benefits after retirement of the Petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. The Petitioner had joined in the Agricultural Market Department on 01.03.1985 and after working in various capacities, had retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation of 62 years at Agricultural Market Committee, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District as Selection Grade Secretary on 30.11.2025. It is stated that till date, either pension or retirement benefits have been sanctioned by the Respondent Authorities. Hence, the present Writ Petition is filed. 3. Heard both learned counsel. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-II, on instructions from Respondent No.4, submits that 11 objections were raised during verification of the Service Register of the Petitioner by the District Audit Officer, State Audit, Kakinada. It is submitted that pursuant thereto, the Regional Joint Director, Marketing, Visakhapatnam, was requested to rectify the objections 1, 2, 3 and 9 vide office memo dated 13.05.2026 and also 4 requested the Establishment and Disciplinary Section at Head Office to furnish information regarding the objections 4 to 8 and objections 9 and 10 respectively vide U.O. Note dated 14.05.2026. It is stated that the Establishment Section and the DC Section, Head Office had furnished information on objections 4 to 8 and 9 and 10 and clarification is to be received from RJDM, Visakhapatnam. 5. Considering the submissions and as the pension papers are under consideration, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the following directions: (i) the Respondent Authorities shall finalize the pensionary benefits due to the Petitioner within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. (ii) the Respondent Authorities shall disburse amount to the Petitioner within a further period of six (06) weeks thereafter. (iii) there shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 02.07.2026 ARR Whether the order is: Speaking Reasoned ✓ Reportable Non-reportable ✓ 5 139 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 16292/2026 Dated: 02.07.2026 ARR