Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46695 (PAT)

Sanjeet Ram v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./860/2026 · 2026-01-21

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.860 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-110 Year-2025 Thana- NATIONAL HIGHWAY District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1 . Sanjeet Ram S/O Sonelal Ram R/O Village- Kubauli Ram, Post- Kubauli Ram, P.S- N.H Bangra, Distt.- Samastipur. 2. Vikki Kumar S/O Vinod Ram R/O Village- Kubauli Ram, Post- Kubauli Ram, P.S- N.H Bangra, Distt.- Samastipur. 3 . Monu Kumar S/O Nitya Nand Ram R/O Village- Kubauli Ram, Post- Kubauli Ram, P.S- N.H Bangra, Distt.- Samastipur. 4. Prince Kumar S/O Basant Ram R/O Village- Kubauli Ram, Post- Kubauli Ram, P.S- N.H Bangra, Distt.- Samastipur. 5 . Sonu Kumar S/O Nitya Nand Ram R/O Village- Kubauli Ram, Post- Kubauli Ram, P.S- N.H Bangra, Distt.- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar , Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rina Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 21-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State . 2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 126 ( 2 ), 115 ( 2 ), 118 (1) , 109 (1) , 303 ( 2 ), 352, 351 ( 2 ) and 3 (5) of BNS. 3 . As per F.I.R., informant namely , Baldev Ram alleged that these petitioner along with other co-accused persons armed variously trespassed into the house of informant and looted Rs. 1 , 50,000/- , chain and mangalsutra from female Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.860 of 2026(2) dt.21-01-2026 2/2 family members of informant. 4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case due to old enmity . Allegation is general and omnibus against these petitioners. Case and counter case . Rest of the allegations are ornamental in nature to make the case grave . Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 5 . Learned counsel for the State oppose the bail petition . 6 Considering the aforesaid fact, clean antecedent of these petitioners and other circumstances of the case , in the event of arrest or surrender within eight weeks from today, let the petitioners, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM Samastipur in connection with N H Bangra Case No. 110 of 2025 , subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 ( 2 ) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS) , 2023 . Koushik/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T