Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46691 (KAR)

SMT MUNIYAMMA v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

WA/8530/2012 · 2026-01-07

Jayant Banerji, T M Nadaf

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:942-DB WA No. 8530 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT APPEAL NO. 8530 OF 2012 (SCST) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. MUNIYAMMA, W/O LATE MUNIKRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, 2. SRI. M. NARASIMHAIAH, S/O LATE MUNIKRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, SINCE DECEASED BY LRS NARASIMAIAH. 2(a). SHANTHAMMA, S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, BOTH RESIDENTS OF MARAMMANAGUDI STREET, AMBEDKAR COLONY, DEVANAHALLI TOWN, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. M.NAGARAJU FOR LR'S OF DECEASED A2, (ABSENT)) Digitally Signed by REKHA R Location : High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:942-DB WA No. 8530 of 2012 AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU DISTRICT, K.G ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU - 560 001. 3. SRI. KRISHNAPPA, SINCE DEAD BY LRs 3(a). CHANNAMARI, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 3(b). PILLANNA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 3(c). SHAMMANNA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS. 3(d). CHANNAKESHAVA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS. 3(e). SHYAMALA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS. 3(f). LALITHA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. 3(g). CHANDRA, AGAED ABOUT 38 YEARS. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:942-DB WA No. 8530 of 2012 3(h). SHIVANNA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. 3(i). GANESHA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS. 3(j). MANJUNATHA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS. 3(k). GEETHA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS. ALL ARE CHILDREN OF LATE KRISHNAPPA AND RESIDENTS OF MAHADEVAKODIGEHALLI VILLAGE, BAGALUR POST, JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. SHIVASHANKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3 (A-C) & R3 (E-K); R3(D) IS DEAD AS PER ORDER DTD 05.03.2020; SRI. KIRAN KUMAR, HCGP FOR R1 & R2) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE, IN THE WRIT PETITION NO.28621/2012(SC/ST) DATED 31.08.2012. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:942-DB WA No. 8530 of 2012 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI) Despite the matter being called up twice, no one appears for the appellants. 2. It appears that the office objections too have not been removed by the learned counsel for the appellants. 3. The writ appeal is therefore dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE PK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18 ct-vn