1 2026:CGHC:3037 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2479 of 2016 1 - M/s Kalyani Cement Industries Industrial Area Tifra, Bilapsur, Through Its Partner Namely Shri Ramavatar Agrawal, S/o Late Shri Jagmohan Das Agarawal, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Agrawal Bhawan, Vidya Nagar, Bilapsur, Police Station And Post Tarbahar, District Bilaspur, Chahttisgarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - Shri Ramavatar Agrawal, S/o Late Shri Jagmohan Das Agrawal, Aged About 56 Years R/o Agrawal Bhawan, Vidya Nagar, Bilaspur, Police Station And Post Tarbahar, District Bilaspur, Chahttisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Industries, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chahttisgarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - Chhattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporation Limited, Through Its Chief General Manager, Chhattisgarh State Industial Development Corporation Limited, Udyog Bhawan, First Floor, Ring Road No.1, Telibandha, Raipur, District Raipur, Chahttisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Chief General Manager, Chhattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporation Limited, Tifra, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chahttisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Official Liquidator, Ministry Of Industry, Department Of Company Affairs, Bank Of India Building, 5th Floor, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Fort, Mumbai- 400023 Maharashtra, District : Mumbai, Maharashtra ... Respondents [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Mr. Bharat Sharma, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.2 & 3 : Mr. Ayaz Naved, Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN 2 (Order on Board) 19.01.2026 1. Heard on IA No.02, which is an application seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. 2. In absence of opposition, permission is granted. IA No.02 is allowed. 3. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. s@if Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge