Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1670 WP No. 5306 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 5306 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
SRI H R KRISHNAMURTHY S/O H.P.RANGASWAMY, AGED ABOUT58 YEARS OCC: COFFEE PLANTER, R/AT NO.72, TEEKAYMANE, SHANKARACHARYA ROAD, VIDYANAGAR, HASSAN – 573 202. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANCHAN JAI NANDAN.,ADVOCATE) AND:
SMT IRIN AARATHI W/O.B.A.PAIS, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT HOSAGADDE VILLAGE, BELAGODU HOBLI, SAKLESHPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573 214. …RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. SUPRITHA.K.H, ADVOCATE)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD. 20.12.2024 IN M.A.NO. 16/2024 PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAKALESHPURA PRODUCED AT ANNX-A.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1670 WP No. 5306 of 2025
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
This petition by the defendant in O.S.No.88/2024 is directed against the impugned order dated 05.06.2024 passed on I.A.No.2 by the trial Court which was confirmed by the first appellate court in M.A.No.16/2024 and dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner- appellant vide judgment dated 20.12.2024.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent and perused the material on record.
3. Though several contentions have been urged by both sides in support of their respective claims and having regard to the fact that the issues in controversy between the parties would necessarily have to be decided only after a full-fledged trial, without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the rival
contentions, I deem it just and appropriate to dispose of this petition by directing the trial Court to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible and in accordance with law. It is further
directed that till disposal of the suit by the trial Court as stated supra, both parties shall maintain status quo in all respects as on
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1670 WP No. 5306 of 2025
today in relation to suit schedule ‘A’ and ‘B’ properties. All rival
contentions between the parties are kept open and no opinion is expressed on the same.
4. Subject to the aforesaid directions, petition stands
disposed of.
Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
Srl.