Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46671 (CAL)

SUKUMAL MAITY v. RAGHUNATH AYURVED MAHAVIDYALAY AND ORS

CO/1044/2023 · 2026-10-05

Md Shabbar Rashidi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

S/L 14 05.10.2026 Court No.551 B.K.N C.O. 1044 of 2023 With CAN 1 of 2023 Sri Sukamal Maity Vs. Raghunath Ayurved Mahavidyalay and Hospital & Anr. Mr. Animesh Majumdar, Mr. Yogesh Kr. Sharma … for the Opposite Party No. 1. 1. None appears for the petitioner. 2. Opposite party no. 1 is represented. 3. It is submitted by the learned advocate for the opposite party no. 1 that the instant revisional application has arisen out of an order passed on 6th January, 2023 in connection with Title Suit No. 76 of 2022. By the impugned order an application under Order VII Rule 11(d) of Code of Civil Procedure filed by the defendant no. 2 was refused. The opposite party no. 1 herein was the plaintiff of the suit. Opposite party no. 1 in the suit being Title Suit No. 76 of 2022 pending before the Learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 1st Court, Contai, Purba Medinipur. 4. The learned advocate appearing for the opposite party no. 1/plaintiff submits that the suit being Title Suit No. 76 of 2022 has been disposed of as withdrawn. 5. In such circumstances since the suit from where the instant revisional application has originated, has been withdrawn and disposed of, the instant revisional application becomes infructuous. 2 6. The petitioner has not appeared today. None appears for the petitioner on 23rd September, 2026 also. 7. In such circumstances, the instant revisional application is dismissed as infructuous. 8. Pending application is also dismissed as infructuous. 9. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)