Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Cont.P.(MD)No.1537 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.06.2026 CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN Cont.P.(MD)No.1537 of 2026 in W.P.(MD)No.8530 of 2023 S.Vijayakumar .. Petitioner / Petitioner – Vs. -
1.Thiru. Simranjeet Singh Kahlon I.A.S., District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Ramanathapuram District. 2.Thiru.Saravanaperumal, Revenue Divisional Officer, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District. 3.Thiru. Ramamoorthy, The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District. .. Contemnors / Respondents 1, 2 & 5 Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the contemnors/respondents 1, 2 and 5 for their wilful disobedience and violation of the order passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No.8530 of 2026 dated 10.12.2025. _____________ Page No. 1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Cont.P.(MD)No.1537 of 2026 For Petitioner : Mr.V.Arunkumar
For Respondents : Mr.D.Venkatesh Government Standing Counsel ORDER The petitioner is before this Court alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 10.12.2025 by the third respondent herein (the fifth respondent in the writ petition). 2. However, it appears that the petitioner failed to appear for the enquiry. Consequently, this Court was constrained to pass an order on 08.06.2026 in the present contempt petition, which reads as follows:- ''2. When the matter came up for hearing, the learned Government Standing Counsel would submit that eventhough notices have been sent for enquiry, the petitioner is not appearing in the matter. 3. In view thereof, let the petitioner appear before the Tahsildar, Paramakudi, on 22.06.2026 or any such date as may be instructed by the Tahsildar, thereafter. Let the further proceedings be undertaken and report be filed before this Court. 4. Call the matter on 29.06.2026.''
3. Pursuant thereto, the third respondent has issued a communication summoning the petitioner for enquiry before passing final orders. _____________ Page No. 2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Cont.P.(MD)No.1537 of 2026
4. Prima facie, it appears that the writ petition itself ought not to have been entertained, as the dispute between the petitioner and the private respondents is essentially private in nature. Nevertheless, this Court had entertained the writ petition and passed an order dated
10.12.2025. 5. In view of the subsequent action taken by the third respondent, this Court directs the third respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6.
Accordingly, recording the compliance initiated by the third respondent, the Contempt Petition stands closed. NCC : Yes / No 29.06.2026 smn2 To 1.Thiru. Simranjeet Singh Kahlon I.A.S., District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Ramanathapuram District. _____________ Page No. 3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Cont.P.(MD)No.1537 of 2026 2.Thiru.Saravanaperumal, Revenue Divisional Officer, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District. 3.Thiru. Ramamoorthy, The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District. _____________ Page No. 4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Cont.P.(MD)No.1537 of 2026 C.SARAVANAN
, J.
smn2 Cont.P.(MD) No.1537 of 2026 29.06.2026 _____________ Page No. 5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis