- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4472 MFA No. 1122 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.1122 OF 2023(MV-D) BETWEEN: 1. SHARADAMMA W/O. KENCHAPPA @ KENCHANNA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS 2. L. K. SATHYAPRAKASH @ PRAKASH S/O. KENCHAPPA @ KENCHANNA AGED ABOUT 13 YEARS APPELLANT NO.2 IS MINOR REPRESENTED BY HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN AND MOTHER 1ST APPELLANT BOTH ARE RESIDING AT LAKKAVVANAHALLI VILLAGE DWARANAKUNTE POST SIRA TALUK-572 137 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI SHANTHARAJ K., ADVOCATE, (ABSENT)) Digitally signed by SOWMYA DODDAMARAIAH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4472 MFA No. 1122 of 2023 AND: 1. KRISHNAPPA R. S/O. RANGAPPA K. AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS RESIDING AT KUDUREKUNTE VILLAGE CHENGAVARA POST SIRA TALUK-572 137 2. THE UNITED INDIA INS. CO. LTD. BY ITS MANAGER JAYADEVA COMPLEX B. H. ROAD TUMAKURU-572 101 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. MANJULA N. TEJASWI, ADVOCATE FOR R-2; V/C/O DATED 11/3/2024, NOTICE TO R-1 IS D/W) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 13.04.2022 PASSED IN MVC NO.1405/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, J.M.F.C., AND ADDITIONAL MACT, SIRA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4472 MFA No. 1122 of 2023 ORAL JUDGMENT No representation on the appellants' side on call. 2. Ms.Manjula N Tejasvi learned counsel for respondent No.2 reiterated her submission that was made on the previous date of hearings. On 30.10.2025, learned counsel for respondent No.2 submitted that basing on the same accident the claimant filed MFA No.7218/2022 and it was disposed of in Lok Adalat and again the present appeal is filed. Learned counsel reiterated her submission on 05.11.2025. On that day learned counsel for the appellants sought time to verify and report. On 20.01.2026, learned counsel for respondent No.2 again made the same submission. On that day learned counsel for the appellants again sought time to verify. However, on this day there is no representation on appellant's side on call. 3. Thus, basing on the submission that is made by learned counsel for respondent No.2 which is not opposed - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4472 MFA No. 1122 of 2023 by learned counsel for the appellants, the appeal stands dismissed. Consequently, the proceedings in IA No.1/2023 are closed. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE DS CT:VC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12