1 2026:CGHC:8035 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 640 of 2026 Alijaved Kujur W/o Late Shri Premdan Aged About 56 Years R/o Barjore, Post- Kansabel, Tahsil- Kansabel, District- Jashpur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Forest And Climate Change, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Secretary Chhattisgarh State Laghu Vanopaj (Vyapar And Vikas) Sahkari Sangh Maryadit Sector-243 Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Executive Director Chhattisgarh State Laghu Vanopaj (Vyapar And Vikas) Sahkari Sangh Maryadit Sector-24, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Collector Jashpur, District- Jashpur (C.G.) 5 - District Forest Officer Chhattisgarh State Laghu Vanopaj (Vyapar And Vikas) Sahkari Sangh Maryadit Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Forest Range Officer Chhattisgarh State Laghu Vanopaj (Vyapar And Vikas) Sahkari Sangh Maryadit Kansabel, District- Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Syed Afaque Hussain Rizvi, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 13.02.2026 1. At the outset learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner is not pressing this writ petition on merits, however, she may be permitted to submit fresh representation before the competent authority for redressal of her claim as pleaded in this writ petition seeking compensation under Rajmohni Devi Tendupatta Samajik BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP Date: 2026.02.13 17:53:19 +0530 2 Suraksha Yojya, and a direction be issued to concerned authority to consider and take decision on representation to be submitted by petitioner within specified time. 2. Learned counsel for the State submits that as the petitioner is not pressing this writ petition on merits, he is having no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. In view of submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed off reserving liberty with the petitioner to submit fresh representation before the concerned authority and, if such representation is submitted, concerned authority shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law, preferably within a further period of 3 months from the date of receipt of representation. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merit of writ petition. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. 6. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Bini