Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46619 (CAL)

SAYANTIKA BASAK v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/25988/2026 · 2026-10-01

Raja Basu Chowdhury

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

30 01.10.2026 Saswata Ct.3. WPA 25988 of 2026 Sayantika Basak Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Mohammad Amin Mr. Ghulam Muztafa Mr. Md. Iqbal …For the petitioner Mr. Pramod Kr. Drolia …For the State 1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is retained with the record. 2.Complaining illegal construction at the behest of the respondent nos. 7 and 8 at holding no. 25/1, Chatterjee Bagan, P.S. Baranagar, Ward no. 8, Kolkata – 700035 and the failure on the part of the municipal authorities to take note of the petitioner’s complaint / representation dated 17th August 2026, the instant writ petition has been filed. 3.The learned advocate appearing for the petitioner would complain that the construction carried out at the locale is without any sanctioned building plan. 4. At the time of call the municipality is not represented, though Mr. Drolia, learned advocate appears on behalf of the State. 5.In the peculiar facts and noting that a compliant has been made, I am of the view that it shall be prudent at this stage to direct the municipal authorities to dispose 2 of the petitioner’s complaint in accordance with law upon giving an opportunity of hearing to the interested parties. 6. It is expected that a decision in this regard shall be taken by the municipality on expeditious basis preferably within a period of 12 weeks from the date. 7. With the above directed and observation, the writ petition is disposed of. 8.All parties shall act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from this Court’s official website. (Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.)