Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46617 (KAR)

SHRIVATHSA S v. SRI K R SHIVANNA

WP/3663/2021 · 2026-01-05

Tara Vitasta Ganju

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:255 WP No. 3663 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU WRIT PETITION NO. 3663 OF 2021 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SHRIVATHSA.S S/O SHIVANNA.K.R. AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/AT VISHALAKSHMI, MOHALA FLAT NO. 401, 1ST MAIN ROAD, KATHRIGUPPE EAST, BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE, BANGALORE-560 085. 2. SMT. SHWETHA.S D/O SHIVANNA.K.R. W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT NO. 296, WARD NO. 150, KAIKONDANAHALLI, SARJAPURA, MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE-560 035. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B.J.MAHESH., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. K.R.SHIVANNA S/O RANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, 2. SMT. LALITHAMMA W/O K.R.SHIVANNA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:255 WP No. 3663 of 2021 3. SMT. SUSHMITHA.S D/O K.R.SHIVANNA, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, NO.1 TO 3 ARE R/AT OPPOSITE TO JAYANAGAR K.S.R.T.C., BUS DEPOT CHICKMAGALURU-577 101 4. SMT. S.KAVYA D/O SHANTHEGOWDA, W/O D.M.SANTHOSH, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/AT NO. 57, GURAPPARAGOWDA, BEEDI, BELURU TOWN, HASSAN DISTRICT-573 115. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.H.SHAMANNA., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2; SRI. A.RAVISHANKAR., ADVOCATE FOR R4; R3-SERVED) THIS WP FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO-QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 02.01.2021 PASSED IN O.S.NO.100/2017 BY THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, CHICKMAGALURU VIDE ANNEXURE-D AS THE SAME IS ILLEGAL AND CANNOT BE SUSTAINED AND CONSEQUENTLY PERMIT THE PLAINTIFFS TO MARK THE DOCUMENT WHICH THEY SOUGHT TO MARK IN THEIR EXAMINATION CHIEF THE RECEIPT DATED 14.09.2013 AS PRAYED FOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:255 WP No. 3663 of 2021 ORAL ORDER 1. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners/plaintiffs fairly submits that, since he is relying on the Agreement to Sell, he will exhibit the Agreement to Sell, in addition to the endorsement to the said agreement to sell dated 02.03.2013. 2. In view of the concession made by the learned counsel for the petitioners/plaintiffs the petition has become infructuous and is accordingly disposed off. All pending applications are closed. 3. The rights and contention of the parties are kept open to be agitated before the Trial Court, albeit in accordance with law. (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE TIN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35 Digitally signed by TARA VITASTA GANJU Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNTAKA