Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46608 (CAL)

SUBHAS BISWAS v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/1162/2026 · 2026-10-05

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

05.10.2026 Court No.35. M/L. 44. Kausik (Allowed) CRM (M) 1162 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Patuli PS Case No. 35/2022 dated 24.02.2022 under Sections 302/201 of Indian Penal Code, 1860. And In the matter of : Subhas Biswas ……Petitioner. Mr. Sagar Saha Mr. Manojit Debnath Mr. Manjeet Saha ……for the Petitioner. Mr. Amarta Ghose Mr. Probal Das ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody for more than 4 years 7 months. Till date only 3 witnesses have been examined out of 22 witnesses cited in the charge sheet. State opposes the prayer for bail. I have taken into account the facts of the case and I find that the genesis of the dispute was between the father and the son. Consequent to which the father has been asked to face the charges of murder of his son. Having regard to the overall circumstances, particularly, the period of incarceration and the trial of the case 2 would consume some more time, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. As such, petitioner, namely Subhas Biswas be enlarged on bail subject to furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of Learned CJM, Alipore, South 24 Parganas. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date fixed before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of District of Kolkata and South 24 Parganas without the prior permission of the learned Trial Court. Thus, CRM (M) 1162 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record. The observations made above are only restricted for adjudication of the bail application and should not be considered a final opinion on the merits of the case. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)