- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4646 MFA No. 3735 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 3735 OF 2020 (CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SIDDAMMA W/O LATE KALANAYAKA @ BORAIAHNA KALANAYAKA AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS 2. DEVAMMA D/O LATE KALANAYAKA @ BORAIAHNA KALANAYAKA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS 3. K. RAVIKUMAR S/O LATE KALANAYAKA @ BORAIAHNA KALANAYAKA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT SINDHUVALLI VILLAGE JAYAPURA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK-570 014 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. KUMARA K.G, ADVOCATE - [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SIDDAMMA D/O LATE KALANAYAKA @ BORAIAHNA KALANAYAKA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4646 MFA No. 3735 of 2020 2. B. BORAIAH S/O LATE SIPAYI BORANAYAKA AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS 3. DEVAMMA D/O B. BORAIAH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 4. BYRESHA S/O B. BORAIAH AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS 5. RACHAMMA D/O LATE KALANAYAKA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS 6. NAGARAJU B S/O B. BORAIAH AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS 7. SHIVAMMA D/O B. BORAIAH AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS 8. GANGADHARA S/O B. BORAIAH AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS 9. JYOTHI D/O B. BORAIAH AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS 10. SAVITHA D/O B. BORAIAH AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS 11. GEETHA D/O B. BORAIAH AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4646 MFA No. 3735 of 2020 ALL ARE R/AT SINDHUVALLI VILLAGE JAYAPURA HOBLI MYSORE TALUK-570 014 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.S. NAGARAJ, ADVOCATE FOR C/R3 TO R11) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, either personally or through video conferencing. Sri.B.S.Nagaraj., counsel for caveator/ respondents 3 to 11 has appeared in person. A perusal of the appeal papers would reflect that the appeal is filed in 2020. Now we are in 2026. The appeal is pending for almost six years. As already noted above, though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, either personally or through video conferencing. It - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4646 MFA No. 3735 of 2020 appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. Because of dismissal of the appeal, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 40