Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4660 (KAR)

SRI. H. L. GURUPRAKASH v. SHRI. UMESH MIRJI

CCC/442/2025 · 2026-04-02

C M Poonacha

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18104-DB CCC No. 442 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 442 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SRI H.L. GURUPRAKASH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS S/O. SRI LAKSHMINARAYAN RESIDING AT NO. 110 HUCCHAPPA BUILDING A/G2 2ND MAIN, 2ND CROSS GOVINDARAJ NAGAR BENGALURU - 560 040 …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI R.S. PRASANNA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SHRI UMESH MIRJI MANAGING DIRECTOR OF HORTICULTURAL PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE MARKETING AND PROCESSING SOCIETY DR. M. H. MARI GOWDA ROAD LALBAGH, BENGALURU. …ACCUSED (BY SRI H.N. SHASHIDHAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI H.S. SUHAS, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SRIDEVI S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18104-DB CCC No. 442 of 2025 THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, PRAYING TO INITIATE CO0NTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED HEREIN FOR HAVING COMMITTED CIVIL CONTEMPT OF THIS HONBLE43 COURT ON ACCOUNT OF WILFUL NON- COMPLIANCE OF THE ORDER DATED 14.03.2024 PASSED BY THIS HONBLE COURT IN W.P. NO.18266/2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND PASS APPROPRIATE ORDER TO PUNISH THE ACCUSED/RESPONDENT & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FRAMING OF CHARGES, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. None appears for the complainant. 2. The learned counsel for the accused submits that the order of dis-obedience of which has been alleged, has been complied with and full payment has been made. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18104-DB CCC No. 442 of 2025 3. In view of the above, we do not consider it apposite to initiate the proceedings under the Contempt of Court Act, 1971. 4. The complaint is accordingly closed. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE SD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3