Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46575 (KAR)

RANGASWAMY D v. SARASWATHI

RFA/592/2019 · 2026-01-09

Anu Sivaraman, Vijaykumar A Patil

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1374-DB R.F.A. No.592/2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.592/2019 (PAR) BETWEEN: RANGASWAMY .D S/O DYAVEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS ANKANAHALLI VILLAGE KATTAYA HOBLI HASSAN TALUK-573201. …APPELLANT (BY SMT. KAVITHA H.C. ADV.,) AND: 1. SARASWATHI W/O DHARANI D/O DYAVEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS THAMLAPURA VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI HASSAN TALUK-573201. 2. VENKATARAMU S/O DYAVEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS ANKANAHALLI VILLAGE KATTAYA HOBLI HASSAN TALUK-573201. Digitally signed by ARSHIFA BAHAR KHANAM Location: High Court Of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1374-DB R.F.A. No.592/2019 3. DYAVEGOWDA S/O LATE RANGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 91 YEARS ANKANAHALLI VILLAGE KATTAYA HOBLI HASSAN TALUK-573201. 4. RADHA W/O LATE VENKATARAMU AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS KATTAYA HOBLI HASSAN TALUK-573201. 5. VANAJAKSHI W/O RANGASWAMY .D ANKANALLI VILLAGE KATTAYA HOBLI HASSAN TALUK-573201. 6. PARVATHAMMA W/O DYAVEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS KATTAYA HOBLI HASSAN TALUK-573201. …RESPONDENTS THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 R/W ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC., PRAYING TO ALLOW THE ABOVE APPEAL AND TO SET ASIDE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE COURT OF PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT HASSAN IN O.S.NO.73/2013 DATED 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2018 IN SO FAR AS IT WHEREBY IT IS HELD THAT PLAINTIFF NO.4 IS ENTITLED FOR 1/7TH SHARE SUIT SCHEDULE ITEM NO.1 TO 10 AND 12 TO 14 PROPERTY IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1374-DB R.F.A. No.592/2019 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the parties have settled the dispute amicably outside the Court, hence, seeks to dismiss the appeal as not pressed and he has filed a memo to that effect. 2. Memo reads as under: "The undersigned submits on instructions that the appellant and respondent in the above matter have settled the matter out of court. Hence the above matter may please be dismissed as 'Not Pressed'. Pray for orders accordingly." 3. Submission and the memo are placed on record. 4. Appeal is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE BSR/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27