SMT. SANTOSH JAKHAR DAUGHTER OF SHRI SHANKAR LAL JAKHAR, WIFE OF SHRI TARA CHAND DHAYAL, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/288/2026 · 2026-03-06
Anil Kumar Upman
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4657 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4657 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:9821] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 288/2026
1. Smt. Santosh Jakhar Daughter Of Shri Shankar Lal Jakhar, Wife Of Shri Tara Chand Dhayal, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 4, Samota Ki Dhani, Chainpura, Sikar, At Present Resident Of Dhaylo Ki Dhani, Ward No. 1, Khachariawas, Tehsil Dantaramgarh, District Sikar (Raj.)
2. Tara Chand Dhayal Son Of Shri Meghraj Dhayal, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Dhaylo Ki Dhani, Ward No. 1, Khachariawas, Tehsil Dantaramgarh, District Sikar (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
2. The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. Superintendent Of Police, Sikar, District Sikar (Raj.)
4. S.H.O. Police Station Dantaramgarh, District Sikar (Raj.)
5. Shankar Lal Jakhar Son Of Shri Kaluram Jakhar, Resident Of Ward No. 4, Samota Ki Dhani, Chainpura, Sikar (Raj.)
6. Bhimaram Jakhar Son Of Shri Shankar Lal Jakhar, Resident Of Ward No. 4, Samota Ki Dhani, Chainpura, Sikar (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shiv Lal Meena, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 06/03/2026
1. Defects pointed out by the registry are overruled.
2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel.
[2026:RJ-JP:9821] (2 of 3) [CRLW-288/2026]
3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondents No.5 to 6 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Arya Samaj Mandir Trust, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi on 29.01.2026 and same has been registered in the Office of Marriage Registration Officer, Chandni Chowk, Old Delhi District on
30.01.2026. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondents No.5 to 6 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection.
5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are
directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.4 - Station House Officer, Police Station Dantaramgarh, District Sikar (Raj.) and respondent No.4 is
directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners.
6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand
disposed of.
[2026:RJ-JP:9821] (3 of 3) [CRLW-288/2026]
8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/345