- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:936 MFA No. 3244 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 3244 OF 2020 (LAC) BETWEEN: 1. KENCHAIAH, SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS ARE APPELLANTS NO.1 TO 3. HUCHAMMA, W/O LATE KENCHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, 2. MAHADEVA S/O LATE KENCHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, 3. CHIKKAJAVARAIAH S/O LATE KENCHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, 4. MAKAIAHA SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS ARE APPELLANTS NO.4 TO 6 MANGALA, W/O LATE MAKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, 5. M LEKITA D/O LATE MAKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 9 YEARS, Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:936 MFA No. 3244 of 2020 6. SANTHOSH S/O LATE MAKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 7 YEARS, APPELLANTS NO.1 TO 6 ARE R/AT NANDANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK AND DISTRICT. APPELLANTS NO.5 AND 6 ARE MINORS AND THEY ARE REPRESENTED BY THIER MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN MANGALA (APPELLANT NO.4) 7. BANNAMMA D/O LATE KENCHAIAH, W/O LATE MAHESH, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT KOTEHUNDI VILLAGE, MYSORE TALUK, MYSURU. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. G.B.MANJUNATHA, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, JLB ROAD, MYSURU-570001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. T.P.VIVEKANANDA, ADVOCATE) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 54(1) OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:936 MFA No. 3244 of 2020 ORAL JUDGMENT Though matter called twice there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. 2. The Appeal is filed in 2020. The appeal is listed today for orders regarding non compliance with the office objection. 3. A perusal of the appeal papers reflects that appeal was filed in 2020. It is almost five years. The appellants have neither shown any interest to comply with the office objection nor have paid the cost. The conduct of the appellants depicts that they are not interested in prosecuting the appeal and furthermore when the matter is filed there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution and also for non compliance of office objections. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17