1 2026:CGHC:7957-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 486 of 2026 Jitendra Solanki S/o Mahendra Solanki Aged About 48 Years R/o A-12 Nirupan Estate Phase- 1, Near Police Station Baghsewniya, Hoshangabad Road Distt- Bhopal (M.P.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Govind Traders Through- Its Propriters Devratan Tapdiya S/o Late Lakshmichand Tapdiya R/o Durg Road Ward No.17 Parshuram Ward Bemetyara Police Station- Tehsil And District- Bemetara (C.G.) 2 - Police Station Bemetara Through- Station House Officer Police Station, Bemetara District- Bemetara (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rishabh Bisen, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 13.02.2026 1. Heard Mr. Rishabh Bisen, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioner. MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2026.02.13 17:32:29 +0530 2 2. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following relief:- “It is therefore prayed accordingly that on the above facts and circumstances this instant petition be allowed and quash the charge sheet/final report dated 26.05.2023, having its Final Report no. 167/2023, of Police Station:- Bemetara, District :- Bemetara, and also to quash the proceedings pending before Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bemetara, District :- Bemetara (C.G.) in criminal case no. 699/2023 (State of Chhattisgarh vs. Jitendra Solanki), in the interest of justice.” 3. From perusal of the relief clause, it transpires that though copy of order framing charge has been annexed with the petition, but the same has not been challenged. This shows that the counsel for the petitioner has drafted a vague and sketchy prayer in a casual manner, thereby wasting the precious time of the Court. 4. In view of the same, learned counsel for the petitioner pray to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh. 5. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file petition afresh, subject to depositing a sum of Rs. 5,000/- as cost by the petitioner in the Registry of this Court and the same shall be transmitted to the Government Multi Handicapped Special School, Bagbahra, District- Mahasamund (C.G.), for wasting the precious time of this Court. 3 6. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner after obtaining the photocopy of the same, subject to deposit of the fine amount. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet