- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4588 WP No. 11173 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 11173 OF 2019 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: 1. SRI MAHESH P S/O. PURUSHOTHAMA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/AT NO. 43/3, 1ST MAIN ROAD, ATTIGUPPE, VIJAYANAGAR, BENGLAURU 560040. 2. SRI. SRIDHAR G S/O. V GAJAPATHI, AGED ABOUUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NO. 134, 3RD-A-CROSS, PRAKASH NAGAR, BENGALURU 560021 …PETITIONERS (PETITIONERS ARE SERVED, ABSENT) AND: 1. THE BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE (BBMP) NR SQUARE, BENGALURU 560002. REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER THE BRUHATH BANGALROE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, BBMP, Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4588 WP No. 11173 of 2019 GALI ANJANEYASWAMY TEMPLE SUB DIVISION, ATTIGUPPE, BENGALURU 560040. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SARITHA KULKARNI, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 08.02.2019 PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT BENGALURU IN APPEAL NO.860/2017. CALL FOR RECORDS IN APPEAL NO.860/2017. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRILIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. Quash the impugned Order date:08-02-2019 Annexure -R passed by the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal at Bengaluru in Appeal No.860/2017. b. Call for records in Appeal No.860/2017. And; c. Pass such other orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the interests of justice and equity. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4588 WP No. 11173 of 2019 2. The earlier learned counsel who had appeared for the petitioners was permitted to retire on account of him not being able to contact the petitioners. 3. Thereafter the matter has been listed today to enable the petitioners to be represented. However, today also no representation. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. 4. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE BVK