Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010276522025 2026:GAU-AS:5512 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7273/2025 ANJAN KUMAR BHUYAN AND ANR S/O- SRI PRAFULLA CHANDRA BHUYAN, R/O- 176 GERUA, GERUAATI, DIST. MORIGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 782121. 2: HARENDRA HAZARIKA S/O- SRI SANATAN HAZARIKA R/O- BARANGABARI CHATANGURI DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM PIN- 782105 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, HAVING HIS OFFICE AT ASSAM SECRETARIAT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI, DIST- KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM, PIN- 781006. 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM EXCISE DEPARTMENT ASSAM SECRETARIAT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006. 3:THE COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM EXCISE DEPARTMENT HOUSEFED COMPLEX DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006. 4:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF EXCISE Page No.# 2/3 EXCISE DEPARTMENT MORIGAON PIN- 782105 ASSAM 5:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER MORIGAON DISTRICT PIN- 781025 ASSAM 6:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY FINANCE (TAXATION) DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM ASSAM SECRETARIAT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 ASSAM 7:THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXES GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM KAR BHAWAN GANESHGURI PIN- 781006 GUWAHATI ASSA Advocate for the petitioner(s): Mr. H Buragohain Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. RR Gogoi, Standing Counsel, Excise Department. B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER 22.04.2026 Mr. H Buragohain, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the grievance of the petitioners in the present Page No.# 3/3 proceedings has already been redressed by the approval of the conversion of the existing IMFL ‘On’ License of the petitioner to IMFL ‘Off’ Licence vide the order of the Commissioner of Excise, Assam dated 12.02.2026. The said order dated 12.02.2026 which has been produced before this Court is kept on record and marked with the letter ‘X’. 2. In view of the above, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, therefore, submits that the petitioners would not like to further pursue the instant writ petition and the same may be closed on withdrawal. 3. Considering the above, the writ petition stands closed on withdrawal. 4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant