Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 465 (CAL)

SURAJIT PAUL v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/29640/2025 · 2026-02-23

Amrita Sinha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

S/L 12 23.02.2026 Court No.18 SD IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION WPA 29640 of 2025 Surajit Paul Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Anindya Bose Mr. Santanu Maji Mr. Mridul Biswas Ms. Debrani Mondal … for the Petitioner. Mr. Biswaroop Bhattacharyya Mr. Rahul Kumar Singh … for the WBCSSC. 1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today be retained with the records. 2. The petitioner participated in the SLST, 2025. He alleges that because of technical glitches, the petitioner was unable to upload his marks obtained by him in the Post-Graduation level. 3. It has been submitted that if proper qualification of the petitioner is taken into consideration, then the petitioner will get at least two more marks. 4. Prayer has been made to direct the Commission to take into consideration the marks obtained by the petitioner at the Post Graduation level. 5. It appears that the application form was filed by the petitioner on July 8, 2025. The instant writ petition has been filed on December 22, 2025, wherein for the first time, the petitioner has disclosed that due to technical glitches he was unable to upload the Post- Graduation score. 2 6. By the time the writ petition was filed, the recruitment process proceeded to a considerable extent and interview list was also published. The Commission is in the process of publishing the final list of selected candidates. At this stage, the prayer of the petitioner for uploading his Post Graduation qualification cannot be allowed. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed. 8. Parties to act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Amrita Sinha, J.)