1 2026:CGHC:8180 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 154 of 2026 Bharti Axa General Insurance Company Ltd Through Authorized Signatory, Sajit Ku. Ray, Aged About 26 Years, R/o II Floor, Jeet Towers, GE Road, P.S. Azad Chowk, District Raipur Chhattisgarh Presently At And Merged With ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd., 5th Floor, Skypark, Opp. Banthia Nursing Home, Raja Talab, Raipur 492001 ----Applicant versus 1 - Patel Nihal S/o Lt. Dhannu Aged About 50 Years R/o Shankarpara, Ward No. 65, Maroda Bhilai, P.S. Nevvai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh District Durg, Chhattisgarh 2 - Smt. Ramni Bai W/o Patel Nihal Aged About 46 Years R/o Shankarpara, Ward No. 65, Maroda Bhilai, P.S. Nevvai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh, District Durg, Chhattisgarh 3 - Arjun S/o Patel Nihal Aged About 14 Years Minor Through Patel Nihal, Father R/o Shankarpara, Ward No. 65, Maroda Bhilai, P.S. Nevvai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh, District Durg, Chhattisgarh 4 - Ku. Payal D/o Patel Nihal Aged About 5 Years Minor Through Patel Nihal, Father R/o Shankarpara, Ward No. 65, Maroda Bhilai, P.S. Nevvai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh, District Durg, Chhattisgarh 5 - Smt. Asha @ Asha Thakur W/o Lt. Banshilal Thakur Aged About 43 Years R/o B.R.P. Colony, Near Kachaan Thela, Ward No. 62, Bhilai District Durg, Chhattisgarh (Non-Applicant No. 1) ---- Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicant : Mr. Palash Agrawal, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Digitally signed by AMIT PATEL 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on board 13.02.2026 1. This is an application for restoration of MCC No. 42/2026 which is dismissed for want of prosecution on 19.01.2026 by this Court. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that due to inadvertence, the counsel who was representing in MCC No. 42/2026 could not appear on 19.01.2026 before this Court, when the matter was called for hearing, therefore, the MCC No. 42/2026 was dismissed for want of prosecution. 3. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant and for the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed, the MCC No. 42/2026 is restored to its original number. 4. Accordingly, the present MCC is allowed. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE AMIT PATEL