- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6711 WP No. 3207 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 3207 OF 2026 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. PUTTA NINGAMMA W/O. LATE DYAVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS, 2. SRI. RANGASWAMY K., S/O. LATE KEMPARAJU, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, 3. SRI. VENKATESHA K. S/O. LATE KEMPARAJU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, 4. SMT. MANCHAMMA W/O. LATE KEMPARAJU, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, 5. SMT. PUTTAMMANNI W/O. LATE KALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 6. SRI. DEVANNA S/O. LATE DEVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, 7. SRI. PUTTA SWAMY S/O. LATE DYAVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, 8. SMT. LAKSHMI W/O. R.A.LAKSHMANA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6711 WP No. 3207 of 2026 9. SMT. MANGALA, W/O. SURESHA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF KOODANAHALLI GRAMA, SOMESHWARAPURA POST, VARUNA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK, MYSORE-570 010. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. J. SATHISHKUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, J.L.B.ROAD, MYSORE-570 010. 2. SRI.K.C.SUBBAIAH, S/O K.C. CAVERIAPPA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/AT NO.22-H, RAMAKRISHNA NAGARA, DATTAGAHALLI EXTENSION, MYSURU-570 010. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T.P. VIVEKANANDA, ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO: (A) CALL FOR RECORDS LEADING ISSUANCE OF THE PROVISIONAL SANCTION PLAN VIDE ORDER NO.MUDA/TP/VI NA/78/2024 DATED 10.02.2025, PERMITTING THE SECOND RESPONDENT TO FORM A RESIDENTIAL LAY OUT IN SURVEY NO.97 MEASURING 3 ACRES 08 GUNTAS AND 3 ACRES 36 GUNTAS IN SURVEY NO.98/1 BOTH LAND SITUATE AT MADARAGALLI VILLAGE, VARUNA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK VIDE ANNEXURE-A; (B) QUASH THE PROVISIONAL SANCTION PLAN VIDE ORDER NO.MUDA/TP/VI NA/78/2024 DATED 10.02.2025 PERMITTING THE SECOND RESPONDENT TO FORM LAY OUT IN SURVEY - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6711 WP No. 3207 of 2026 NO.97 MEASURING 3 ACRES 08 GUNTAS AND 3 ACRES 36 GUNTAS IN SURVEY NO.98/1 BOTH LAND SITUATE AT MADARAGALLI VILLAGE, VARUNA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK VIDE ANNEXURE-A, SINCE LAY OUT IS FORMED BY SHOWING PETITIONERS LAND IN SURVEY NO.73/1 AS ROAD TO REACH THE LAY OUT FORMED IN SURVEY NO.97 AND 98/1; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Sri T.P.Vivekananda, learned counsel, is directed to accept notice for respondent No.1. 2. Notice to respondent No.2 is dispensed with in view of the proposed order to be passed. 3. Petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: “a. Call for records leading issuance of the provisional sanction plan vide order No. MUDA/TP/VI NA/78/2024 dated 10.02.2025, permitting the second respondent to form a residential lay out in survey No.97 measuring 3 acres 08 guntas & 3 acres 36 guntas in survey No.98/1 both land situate at Madaragalli village, Varuna Hobli, Mysore Taluk vide ANNEXURE-A. b. Issue writ of certiorari and Quash the provisional sanction plan vide order No. MUDA/TP/VI NA/78/2024 dated 10.02.2025 permitting the second respondent to form lay out in survey No.97 - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6711 WP No. 3207 of 2026 measuring 3 acres 08 guntas & 3 acres 36 guntas in survey No.98/1 both land situate at Madaragalli village, Varuna Hobli, Mysore Taluk vide ANNEXURE-A, since lay out is formed by showing petitioners land in survey No.73/1 as road to reach the lay out formed in survey No.97 & 98/1. c. Direct the second respondent to remove the portion of land in survey No.73/1 from the lay out plan shown as road to reach the residential lay out provisionally approved by the first respondent on 10.02.2025. d. To pass/grant such other order/s or relief/s as this Hon'ble Court deems fit under the circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity.” 4. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks for liberty to file necessary applications for injunction and the like reliefs in the appeal to be filed by the petitioner. Reserving such liberty to the petitioners, petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on the merits of the matter. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE TL/List No.: 2 Sl No.: 9