Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4731 RSA No. 376 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 376 OF 2024 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
RAMACHANDRA R S/O LATE RAMACHANDRA RAO AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/O BAILUJADDU HOUSE NEAR INDUSRTRIAL AREA KARKALA TALUK UDUPI DISRICT-574 104 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SRIKANTH V.K., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND:
1.
SRI GURU RAGHAVENDRA SWAMY TRUST REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT KARKALA TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT-574104
2.
SRI P SADASHIVA BHAT S/O LATE P RAMANNA BHAT AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS R/O PUCHIBETTU HOUSE DODDAMANE, PERVAJE KARKALA TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT-574104
3.
SRI V V UPADHYAYA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4731 RSA No. 376 of 2024
ADVOCATE, 777 IIM LAYOUT R T NAGAR, BANGALORE-560032
4.
SUBRAMANYA P AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS CLERK AT SRI GURU RAGHAVENDRA SWAMY TRUST, KARKALA UDUPI-574104
5.
SRI GURU RAGHAVENDRA SWAMY TRUST REP BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE HIS HOLINESS VISHWESHA THIRTA SWAMIJI PEJAVAR MUTT TELLAR ROAD KARKALA TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT-574104
6.
SRI K RAGHAVENDRA ACHAR AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS S/O LATE VITTAL ACHAR R/O ACHARYA COMPOUND TELLAR ROAD KARKALA TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT-574104
7.
SRI P SADHASHIVA BHAT S/O LATE P NARAYANA BHAT AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS R/O PUCHHIBETTU GUTHU DODAMANE PERVAJJE KARKALA TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT-574104
8.
SRI P VITTAL BHAT AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/O PUCHHIBETTU GUTHU DODAMANE PERVAJJE KARKALA TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT-574104
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4731 RSA No. 376 of 2024
9.
SRI L G BHAT AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS R/O PUCHHIBETTU GUTHU DODAMANE PERVAJJE KARKALA TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT-574104
10. SRI SRIRAMANA ACHAR AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/O RAGHAVENDRAPURA TELLAR ROAD KARKALA TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT-574104
11. SRI PRASANNA ACHAR AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/O SRI DURGAPARAMESHWARI TEMPLE ROAD, KEMMANU NITTE VILLAGE KARKALA TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT-574104 …RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE AND QUASH THE ANNEXURE-B VIDE
ORDER IN RA NO. 56/2013 PASSED BY THE 2ND ADDL.
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, UDUPI, DATED 17/10/2022 AND TO RESTORE THE SUIT AND ETC.,
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4731 RSA No. 376 of 2024
ORAL JUDGMENT This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for sixth time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellant was
directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 49