Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4645 (PNJ)

ANKUSH v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/72023/2025 · 2026-02-24

Kirti Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

KIRTI SINGH KIRTI SINGH The translated version of the FIR is reproduced below SEEMA 2026.02.26 13:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document SEEMA 2026.02.26 13:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document SEEMA 2026.02.26 13:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Heard the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties. 6. 7. In the present case, charges have been framed in relation to offence under Section 6 of the POCSO Act. In cases similar to the present one, factors which warrant consideration of the Court also include, but are not limited to the age of the prosecutrix and its difference from the age of the petitioner, so as to also determine the element of perversion; and the arguments raised, particularly with respect to the contents of the statements SEEMA 2026.02.26 13:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document made by the prosecutrix. No photographs have been recovered from the mobile phone of the petitioner, as per the submission of learned State counsel. SEEMA 2026.02.26 13:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document SEEMA 2026.02.26 13:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document KIRTI SINGH Sima SEEMA 2026.02.26 13:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document