Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46405 (KAR)

SMT JAYAMMA v. ANNAIHAPPA

WP/2253/2026 · 2026-01-27

S R Krishna Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4383 WP No. 2253 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.2253 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. JAYAMMA D/O LATE ANNAIHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT NERALUR VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT – 562 107. 2. SAVITHRI @ PAPA, D/O LATE ANNAIHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, 3. JYOTHI, D/O LATE ANNAIHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, PETITIONER NO.2 AND 3 ARE R/AT S. BINGIPURA VILLAGE, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT – 562 114. GIRIJAMMA SINCE DEAD BY HER LR'S KRISHNAMURTHY H.N., SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR'S, 4. SMT. SUNANDA W/O LATE H.N. KRISHNAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, 5. SRIDEVI H K D/O LATE H.N. KRISHNAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4383 WP No. 2253 of 2026 6. MEGANA H.K., D/O LATE H.N. KRISHNAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS, PETITIONER NO.6 IS A MINOR REP. BY HER MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, SMT. SUNANDA 7. SHANTHA N., D/O LATE H.K. NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, PETITIONER NOS.4 TO 7 ARE R/AT DEVANAGUNDI HOSAHALLI, DEVANAGUNDI, HOSAKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT – 560 067. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. K. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: ANNAIHAPPA SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR'S LR’S ARE ALREADY ON RECORD AS PLAINTIFFS 1 TO 4 AND DEFENDANTS NO.2 TO 12 1. VENKATAMMA W/O ANNAIHAPPA AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS, 2. MUNIRAJU S/O ANNAIHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 3. RAVI, S/O ANNAIHAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, 4. SURESH S/O ANNAIHAPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, 5. MANJUNATH S/O ANNAIHAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4383 WP No. 2253 of 2026 6. AMBARISH S/O ANNAINAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, BABU SINCE DEAD WITHOUT ISSUES 7. LAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, 8. SHOBA D/O NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, 9. MANJULA D/O LATE NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS RESPONDENT NO.1 TO 9 ARE R/AT SARJAPURA VILLAGE AND HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT – 562 125. 10. SANTHOSH S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT VALEPURA VILLAGE, VARTHUR HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT – 560 087. 11. PADMAKSHMMA D/O LATE CHIKKA MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS R/AT JIGANI VILLAGE AND HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT – 560 105. 12. SAMPANGI RAMA REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4383 WP No. 2253 of 2026 13. SRI. H. T. RAMA REDDY, S/O LATE THIMMA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT HULIMANGALA VILLAGE, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT – 560 105. …RESPONDENTS THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 05.11.2025 AND ORDER DATED 24.11.2025 PASSED BY THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AT ANEKAL, IN R.A.NO.5052/2025 IN NOT GRANTING EX-PARTE TEMPORARY INJUNCTION ORDER ON IA NO.4, UNDER ORDER 39 RULES 1 AND 2 R/W SEC 151 OF CPC AND IA DATED 24.11.2025 FILED UNDER ORDER 39 RULES 1 AND 2 R/W SEC 151 OF CPC. (ANNEXURE-A). CONSEQUENTLY, GRANT AN EX-PARTE ORDER OF TEMPORARY INJUNCTION AS PRAYED IN IA NO.4 FILED UNDER ORDER 39 RULES 1 AND 2 R/W SEC 151 OF CPC (ANNEXURE-E) AND IA DATED 24.11.2025 FILED UNDER ORDER 39 RULES 1 AND 2 R/W SEC 151 OF CPC (ANNEXURE-G) BY ALLOWING THIS WRIT PETITION AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petition may be disposed of with a direction to the Appellate Court to pass appropriate orders on the application – I.A.No.4 filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC by the petitioners – appellants in R.A.No.5052/2025, within a stipulated timeframe. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4383 WP No. 2253 of 2026 2. The said submission is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, petition stands disposed of directing the Appellate Court to pass appropriate orders on the aforesaid application filed by the petitioners – appellants in R.A.No.5052/2025, on merits and in accordance with law within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE SV List No.: 11 Sl No.: 7