Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 46405 (CAL)

IMTIAZUL HAQUE v. UJJWAL SARKAR THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

CPAN/737/2024 · 2026-10-05

Shampa Sarkar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

05.10.2026 SL No.23 Court No.12 (gc) CPAN 737 of 2024 In WPA 17510 of 2021 Imtiazul Haque Vs. Ujjwal Sarkar & Anr. Mr. Saurav Chaudhuri …for the Applicant. Mr. Alak Kumar Ghosh, Ms. Manisha Nath ….for the Alleged Contemnors. 1. The demolition proceeding was initiated in terms of the order of this Court and has been reached to its logical conclusion. It appears that two additional floors were directed to be demolished and some part of the deviation was directed to be retained upon payment of fees. The person responsible for the construction has preferred an appeal before the Municipal Building Tribunal. 2. Under such circumstances, the contempt application is disposed of. 3. Contempt proceedings are dropped. 4. A copy of the report which has been placed before this Court be handed over to the learned Advocate-on-record for the applicant. 5. The applicant will be at liberty to take necessary steps as he may deem fit and proper. 2 6. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied, be supplied to the parties on usual undertaking. (Shampa Sarkar, J.)